I didn't start the thread , but thought to contribute in the style as first written. Resorting to name calling is against the rules too.
Sent from my iPad On 5/04/2012, at 10:31 PM, Daniel Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Far out, you made your point earlier, what a dick you are. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 5/04/2012, at 4:10 PM, Parks White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Spoiler 2. Not for younger viewers >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I want to clarify that I did not mean to imply that Pug was born by >> "immaculate conception" between a bartroll and Kalkin as that would bring >> this discussion into one of cosmology and religion and not allowed under >> list rules..... >> >> And there are young people here as well. >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On 5/04/2012, at 3:50 PM, Parks White <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> SPOILER? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> A bar wench and a tavern girl? Might explain how he got his magical >>> abilities... No father then I guess?.... Maybe you meant a bar wench or a >>> tavern girl, fairly synonymous terminology I would think anyway... Possibly >>> a manifestation/ fathered by Ba-nath/Kalkin, the God of Pranksters and left >>> in the woods? >>> >>> parks3 >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 5/04/2012, at 3:35 PM, John Buttimer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Wasn't he told by Macross who they were? Like a bar wench and some tavern >>>> girl? Oops forgot spoilers spacing. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >> >> > >
