Sent from my iPad
On 6/04/2012, at 1:17 AM, Ray Chiang <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/5/2012 6:06 AM, LAR wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Stroup, Shelley A CIV SWOS N61 >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> S >>> P >>> O >>> I >>> L >>> E >>> R >>> >>> >>> S >>> P >>> O >>> I >>> L >>> E >>> R >>> >>> >>> S >>> P >>> O >>> I >>> L >>> E >>> R >>> >>> S >>> P >>> O >>> I >>> L >>> E >>> R >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Back to the topic: >>> >>> 1. Pug's parentage is currently "unknown". >>> >>> While it currently may seem just an offhand "throwaway" comment, and >>> eliminating the lesbian bargirls and iincestuous time travellers as >>> serious parenting options, I still think Kalkin is a good Candidate for >>> Pug's father. it would be his greatest trick yet. It explains Pug's >>> magical abilities and special relationship to Kalkin rather nicely. >>> Perhaps this may be revealed in future publications?(or not) >> Ray has made it clear and often, Pugs parents are non-entities. A >> tavern girl and a passing soldier. > > Just to be clear, REF's answers over the years: > > http://www.crydee.com/raymond-feist/faq/2620/who-were-pugs-parents > > -Ray > > Thanks for the reference, dealing with newbies must be tiresome. Any chance > the solider was Kalkin in disguise? :-) Parks3
