Thought it was played with a brown ovaloid shaped ball with only one person allowed to throw forward?
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Keith Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey there, we all know that real football is not played with a soccer ball ;) > > Keith > > From: StephenB <[email protected]> > To: feistfans-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 4:03 AM > Subject: Re: The Nameless One > > You've even got a bunch of football fans... that's proper football, where you > kick the ball not throw it! Most of them have even forgiven you for being a > Wolves fan! :) > > The transfer window speculation is ramping up to silly season... nice to know > it's spread to this thread as well! > > S > > -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Feist > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:50 AM > To: feistfans-l > Subject: Re: The Nameless One > > > On Jul 11, 2012, at 5:34 PM, Noah Melnick wrote: > > > I'm pretty sure that there is zero legal issue with guessing the outcome of > > the next book since only an idiot would think I had some claim to something > > because of such a guess, but to avoid another long and pointless chain of > > e-mails where people that aren't legal experts pontificate about the law, I > > shall cease speculating. But, it actually does raise another question for > > me, what do most people on this list do for a living? I for one am a > > structured finance and derivatives lawyer. Ray, do you have demographics > > data on your fans, e.g. average age, occupations, etc.? > > > Nope. I've gotten fan mail from people as old as 90 and as young as 9. They > work everywhere, and are of every type of job you could imagine. It > confounds my publisher at times re: marketing, but it's all good, because > whoever they are, they keep buying stuff and I keep writing it. > > I just wish I had a higher percentage of supermodels who had a thing for > older writers; other than that, it's a really nice bunch. > > Best, R.E.F. > ---- > www.crydee.com > > Never attribute to malice what can satisfactorily be explained away by > stupidity. > > > > > > > > > >
