A great and interesting reply Ray.

Really intriguing to know some behind the scenes info about the books.

Shep.






On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Stroup, Shelley A CIV SWOS N61 <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Ray for the background story on the Kelewan series, which is one of
> my favorite series!  This is why I love this List, you can't get that kind
> of answer with 140 characters or less!  :)
>
> And Anestis we all know you win the conversation! :D
>
> Shells:)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Raymond Feist
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 8:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Discussion with friend about Kelewan
>
> I've commented on this before, but in brief, what came through the game
> was the concept of Great Path/Lesser Path magic, which was a mechanical way
> to deal with why we had to concepts of magic, I should add, not that we
> were using EPT Magic system.  The only thing that ever made it's way into
> the game were the EPT monsters.
>
> So the concept of a riftwar was how we explained that.   The one other
> concept that held on to was the metal poor thing, because I thought it made
> for a cool distinction technologically.    Other than that, nada from EPT.
>
> I dealt with this silly nonsense 20 years ago.  I've heard "Feist stole
> his ideas from Barker,"  "He stole Barker's dream," etc.  Look, Phil Barker
> got published by DAW, two EPT novels, I believe.  They did not do very
> well.  Whatever tiny elements I inherited through the game, took nothing
> away from his opportunity for an audience to find his work.  Apparently,
> not many people were that interested in his fiction.  He had a very loyal,
> very supportive game community that loved his stuff and they stuck with him
> quite a long while, but EPT never challenged D&D either.
>
> Joel Rosenberg, God rest him, knew the situation intimately, living in
> Minneapolis, where Phil lived, and knowing him through the SF/F community.
>  His take was simply that Barker felt a sense of injury.  What he
> apparently didn't know or didn't care to know was that before Magician was
> published, Steve Abrams explained the genesis of the Petal Throne to me,
> lent me the manual, and I went though a VERY early draft of Magician and
> took out everything that was remotely EPT and that's when I started melding
> my Chinese/Japanese/Korean/Aztec/Zulu culture--I believe EPT was based on
> Indian/Dravidian culture, not Asian.  I kept the bugs because I liked them,
> but I went for a hive-mind thranx, not whatever it was EPT had, and the one
> thing that probably set this whole thing off was I didn't change the name
> Tsurani, which was just me doing a funny spelling of the Serani tribe of
> Africa; I went for the Ts because of Senator Paul Tsongis just because I
> thought it looked cool.
>
> Anyway, Phil is dead, and Joel is dead, and anyone who has any sense of
> what influence is all about in the world of writing knows that what came
> from EPT through the game into my work is trivial.  30 novels over 30 years
> did not result from any labor but my own.
>
> Best, R.E.F.
>
>         On Mar 27, 2013 7:07 PM, "Anestis Kozakis" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>                 Hi Ray,
>
>                 A friend and I have an on-going discussion about Kelewan.
>  He has the impression that you borrowed a large number of elements of
> Kelewan from M.A.R. Barker's "Empire of the Petal Throne".
>
>                 He cites a couple of articles:
>
>                 http://ferretbrain.com/articles/article-134.html under
> the "Why I only buy his books second hand" heading.  The writer of the
> article claims you have admitted that Kelewan was very heavily from
> Barker's work in various conversations with fans.
>
>                 The other article is at
> http://www.rpg.net/columns/designers-and-dragons/designers-and-dragons13.phtmland
>  has the following paragraphs around the middle of the article:
>
>                 "Midkemia's unique creation has also resulted in one bit
> of controversy: according to Feist, the original Midkemian Campaign run by
> Abrams and Everson contained some minor elements borrowed from Tékumel, as
> described in TSR's Empire of the Petal Throne (1975). Those elements were,
> of course, not brought into any of Midkemia Press' published books.
> However, Feist wasn't aware of this genesis, so some of these elements did
> find their way into the world of Kelewan - which opposed Midkemia in the
> Riftwar. Feist says the ultimate impact of Tékumel on the novels is
> "superficial", with other sources like Alan Dean Foster's Thranx and Jack
> Vance's Big Planet being just as important.
>
>
>                 Ultimately, we outsiders can never know the exact
> influence of the EPT world filtered through a house campaign upon Feist's
> writing. Suffice to say, it might be more than professional writer Raymond
> Feist is comfortable with and probably is a lot less than fans have
> suggested over the years."
>
>                 I keep bringing up how you have always stated that you
> borrowed from Japan, China, etc etc (the answer you always give when
> someone asks about the influences for the Tsruanni society).
>
>                 Just wondering if you would like to share your thoughts on
> the issue.
>
>                 Anestis Kozakis
>
>
>

Reply via email to