On 6/1/06, Timothy Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/1/06, Rob Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Will hopefully get a chance to move mangen into Felix quite soon. > > The proposed package name that most seemed happy with at last count was: > > org.apache.felix.mangen > > I could also live with any of the following if people think they're > better: > > org.apache.felix.tools.mangen > org.apache.felix.utils.mangen > org.apache.felix.support.mangen Is there no overwhelming desire by the community to distinguish between support tools code and actual Felix source via package naming conventions?
I prefer org.apache.felix.tool.mangen. (I usually don't use plural for a package name component.) Of course we can go with org.apache.felix.mangenfor a while and move to tool.mangen when we get more tools. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP key fingerprints: * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6
