Marcel Offermans wrote: > On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:32 , Upayavira wrote: > >> Marcel Offermans wrote: >>> If nobody else volunteers, I will attempt to >>> remove the offending code. Perhaps it is a good idea if we start doing >>> this now (maybe even in a branch or sandbox for now so we can easily >>> apply this if necessary). >> >> That sounds like a good idea - to do a dry run in a sandbox. You willing >> to give it a quick try? > > Sure, this weekend I can give it a try (earlier is impossible for me).
That's great. Basically, we're taking a risk having votes with pending items. Thinking about this, I'd like to change my proposal: we can vote ourselves with a pending item outstanding, but, on reflection, it is unreasonable to expect the incubator PMC to vote on graduation (which implies the resolution of all outstanding issues) without us having resolved all issues! Therefore, lets get this fixed (this weekend should be fine) before we consider asking the Incubator PMC to vote on graduation. I guess what I'm saying is that we shouldn't just do it in a sandbox, we should do it in trunk - remove the code now, and re-add it as soon as we have the required dependency available. WDYAT? Regards, Upayavira
