Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Friday 01 September 2006 16:58, santillan wrote: >> Just a note: while JMood's initial version was LGPL'd, a software grant was >> given to the ASF and the JMood code in the trunk is properly ASL'd. >> Moreover, I've removed the dependency to MX4J just in case (as it was easy >> to refactor), so currently only depends on osgi.core, osgi.compendium, the >> framework and Junit, so no licensing problems here :-) > > Cool. So we are discussing a hypothetical case ;o)
Well, the issue that remains is how we use jfree and jcommon, both of which are, as I understand it, Jmood dependencies, and both are LGPL. Upayavira
