I agree with Alan here. Maven can get ugly with you if you start to
stray from it's conventions. It might be worth considering his approach.
Alex
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
On 1/26/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One thing we could possibly do is to allow both:
<embed-dependency>
groupId=org.mortbay.jetty;artifactId=jetty,*;scope=runtime</embed-
dependency>
or
<embed>
<match groupId="org.mortbay.jetty" artifactId="jetty"/>
<match scope="runtime"/>
</embed>
In the spirit of not trying to make more work for you, I would be
happy to contribute the latter.
A maven convention is not to use xml attributes but subelements
<embed>
<match>
<groupId>org.mortbay.jetty</groupId>
<artifactId>jetty<artifactId/>
</match>
</embed>
Do I hear allowing all three!! ;-)
-> richard
