Thanks Michelle,
Although your explanation is kind of depressing! I thought that's ALDF did pay attorneys in various areas to take cases such as this. I thought that's where the membership money went. I realize they are always going to be more than overwhelmed, as is everyone who works with any kind of animal issues, but I thought if a lot of people donated money to them FOR Hideyo's case it would be a cheaper way to go........
Also, I think the limit laws ARE unconstitutional and I think it does need to go to Federal Court. (Not Hideyo's case specifically, but limits in general) We have a few attorneys here in the Atlanta area that take on animal cases, and they wouldn't work totally pro bono either, but I'm sure they would do the best they could. I hope this attorney will take Hideyo's case in the same manner. I think I mentioned I've known of several in my area
that had to go through this. Some moved. One moved animals around for a while and skirted the issue, etc.... They were not personal friends so I don't know the specifics. I do know that it cost them a lot of money with attorneys and they got basically nowhere. :(
That's why I'd like to see it go to court as being unconstitutional. Which it is!!!!!!!!!!! If it's not unconstitutional for people to have as many children as they want then I don't see a difference. It p*sses me off totally!
t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tonya,The only way something like this would go to the federal level, probably, is if every level of a state court upheld the law and it was appealed to the U.S. Supreme court on federal constitutional grounds. It would be possible to sue a city in federal court to begin with on federal constitutional grounds, but for various reasons legally that would probably not be the way to go-- state court is. And in Hideyo's case, where she is appealing a municpal court decision under a state law that allows such appeals to go to state court, it would be very complicated and not recommended to go to federal court.As for ALDF, they only have one or two lawyers at this point, in CA, and they are deep into other cases. The network they have of member attorneys (like me) is simply that, a network. They apparently do not even refer members of the public to attorneys in their network, because that is not what people sign up for when they sign up as members-- they just sign up to get updates and be part of the organization, not have their info given out to members of the public with particular cases. ALDF was willing to give me two names because I am actually an attorney member, and I called them but one was retired and the other was not working in the same place anymore. The attorney I found for Hideyo is an ALDF member, but for some reason ALDF did not even give me her name and number, I got it from Alley Cat Allies. And I would bet for sure that she is the only ALDF attorney member in Albuquerque-- she does not know of any others. She did offer to make a few calls for Hideyo for free, but because she is trying to make a living doing exclusively animal law (which is great! and rare!), she does need to charge her clients or she will not be able to make a living and will have to go back to doing another kind of law for pay. And every animal law related client is going to be someone who we would think should get pro bono services-- a rescuer, a shelter, a person with an animal in a bad situation, etc. If she did them all for free she could not do this work as her main job. Plus she spends a lot of time, on her own without pay, trying to get a TNR ordinance passed in Albuquerque, so she really does need to do paid work the rest of the time. So I totally understand why she can not do it pro bono. I would bet she will not charge Hideyo as much as a run of the mill lawyer would, though-- we will have to see what they work out.Hope that helps explain the situation,MichelleIn a message dated 12/23/2005 10:01:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Hideyo,I can't believe ALDF won't find someone to take your case pro bono. I am a member. Maybe if all of us wrote ALDF on your behalf they would reconsider?I will be glad to add to your fund as well in the meantime, but it's going to have to be after the holidays. I have mail stacked to the ceiling and don't even know how much money I do (or don't, lol) have until I sit down and get my checkbook in order! But I know I have some money for your cause.Plus if you could win this case it would help others who live with these ridiculous laws, like where I live. Our county limit is 8 animals. I would LOVE to see someone take it to court! And really, I can't believe no one has done this before (like ALDF) and got it to a federal level. In my opinion it's unconstitutional!t

