On 16 September 2013 11:49, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, but they still reside withing the > > demo/documented/foo/cpp > > directory with an empty document.rst file. > > Technically they should reside in: > > demo/undocumented/foo/cpp > > right? >
Splitting up the C++ and Python versions of a demo would be confusing. Ideally and most efficient, the C++ and Python version would be documented at the same time. I'm happy for a demo to sit in 'documented' if one of the two interfaces is documented. Garth > Johan > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> They were not documented (only the Python versions). >> >> -- >> Anders >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:25:18PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: >> > Nice! >> > >> > It looks like the corresponding cpp demos are not updated correctly on >> > the web. >> > >> > Johan >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > 15 more demos are now documented: >> > >> > >> > http://fenicsproject.org/documentation/dolfin/dev/python/demo/index.html >> > >> > (If not all 24 demos show up in that list, it's because they were >> > overwritten by some cronjob on the web server, but they should >> > reappear later.) >> > >> > The demos were documented by Solveig Masvie and a group of fellow >> > Simula summer interns. Thanks! >> > >> > Please help out to check for problems/inconsistencies. I have made >> > one >> > round of proofreading but it was very tedious work so another pair >> > of >> > eyes would be welcome. >> > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
