On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:54:15AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> On 16 September 2013 11:49, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ok, but they still reside withing the
> >
> >   demo/documented/foo/cpp
> >
> > directory with an empty document.rst file.
> >
> > Technically they should reside in:
> >
> >   demo/undocumented/foo/cpp
> >
> > right?
> >
>
> Splitting up the C++ and Python versions of a demo would be confusing.
> Ideally and most efficient, the C++ and Python version would be
> documented at the same time. I'm happy for a demo to sit in
> 'documented' if one of the two interfaces is documented.

Yes, it would be confusing to split them up in separate directories.

If there are empty documentation.rst files in there, those should be
removed. There were a bunch of empty main.cpp files which I removed
together with quite a few empty documentation.rst files. I must have
missed some of them. I'll take a look.

--
Anders



> Garth
>
> > Johan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> They were not documented (only the Python versions).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:25:18PM +0200, Johan Hake wrote:
> >> > Nice!
> >> >
> >> > It looks like the corresponding cpp demos are not updated correctly on
> >> > the web.
> >> >
> >> > Johan
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >     15 more demos are now documented:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://fenicsproject.org/documentation/dolfin/dev/python/demo/index.html
> >> >
> >> >     (If not all 24 demos show up in that list, it's because they were
> >> >     overwritten by some cronjob on the web server, but they should
> >> >     reappear later.)
> >> >
> >> >     The demos were documented by Solveig Masvie and a group of fellow
> >> >     Simula summer interns. Thanks!
> >> >
> >> >     Please help out to check for problems/inconsistencies. I have made
> >> > one
> >> >     round of proofreading but it was very tedious work so another pair
> >> > of
> >> >     eyes would be welcome.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fenics mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
> >
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to