On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2013-10-31 14:15, Anders Logg wrote:
>
>> Great job! It's all green now. :-)
>>
>> Time for a release?
>>
>>
> Yes(!),


Agree!


> but what do we do about the gcc/libstdc++ 4.8.1 bug in Ubuntu? It's not
> our bug but it does break the intersection code on Ubuntu 13.10.
>

Is there an easy workaround in dolfin code? In that case, could we provide
a patch that could accompany the Ubuntu source package, or if it is a small
fix we could just apply it for the release branch?


> Can we create a release branch to not slow down developments that are not
> yet ready for a release?
>

Would that be a maint branch?


> We should also synchronise version numbers across projects. Figuring out
> compatibility across FEniCS projects is very confusing for users.


I think they are well synchronized. It is only ufc that does not follow
the 1.X pattern, which instead follows the 2.X pattern.

Johan




>
> Garth
>
>
>
>  --
>> Anders
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:02:52PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Lawrence Mitchell
>>> <lawrence.mitchell@imperial.**ac.uk <[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I suspect dolfin (or something down the chain) was built against one
>>> mpi
>>> > library (say mpich) but is being run with another (openmpi, by the look
>>> > of it).
>>>
>>> Thanks, that was actually one of the first things I checked. I found
>>> one mpich package (libmpich2-3) but update-alternatives showed that
>>> OpenMPI was being used, so I thought it was okay. After a closer look,
>>> it turned out that the libptscotch-5.1 package was linked with mpich.
>>> Removing these packages and let Dorsal build SCOTCH fixed the problem.
>>>
>>> Johannes
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> fenics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fenicsproject.org/**mailman/listinfo/fenics<http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> fenics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fenicsproject.org/**mailman/listinfo/fenics<http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> fenics mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fenicsproject.org/**mailman/listinfo/fenics<http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to