UFL and FFC now have empty diff between master and next. Martin
On 20 November 2013 13:03, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[email protected]> wrote: > Great, I'd like that fix to be in 1.3. > > UFL is good, none of the issues are for 1.3. Note that ufl/next contains > merges that should not go into 1.3. > > Same for ffc/next, but I'm looking to see if there are some things in > ffc/next that _should_ be in master. > > Martin > > > On 20 November 2013 12:49, Øyvind Evju <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm hoping to push a fix to this one: >> >> >> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/155/boundarymesh-generates-a-mesh-with-too-few >> >> >> -Øyvind >> >> >> 2013/11/20 Johannes Ring <[email protected]> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:14:39PM +0100, Jan Blechta wrote: >>> >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:59:38 +0100 >>> >> Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Is it only this one? >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/10/nonlinearvariationalsolver-does-not-pass >>> >> >>> >> And this one, I guess >>> >> >>> >> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/149/test-vtk6 >>> > >>> > ok. I can fix the first one. Any progress on the second (VTK)? >>> >>> I will take a look. >>> >>> Johannes >>> _______________________________________________ >>> fenics mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fenics mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> >> >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
