On 2013-11-20 12:03, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
Great, I'd like that fix to be in 1.3.
I've changed the report milestone to 1.3.
Garth
UFL is good, none of the issues are for 1.3. Note that ufl/next
contains merges that should not go into 1.3.
Same for ffc/next, but I'm looking to see if there are some things in
ffc/next that _should_ be in master.
Martin
On 20 November 2013 12:49, Øyvind Evju <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm hoping to push a fix to this one:
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/155/boundarymesh-generates-a-mesh-with-too-few
[4]
-Øyvind
2013/11/20 Johannes Ring <[email protected]>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:14:39PM +0100, Jan Blechta wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:59:38 +0100
Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it only this one?
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/10/nonlinearvariationalsolver-does-not-pass
[1]
And this one, I guess
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/149/test-vtk6
[2]
ok. I can fix the first one. Any progress on the second (VTK)?
I will take a look.
Johannes
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics [3]
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics [3]
Links:
------
[1]
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/10/nonlinearvariationalsolver-does-not-pass
[2] https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/149/test-vtk6
[3] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
[4]
https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/155/boundarymesh-generates-a-mesh-with-too-few
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
