Hmm... Yes perhaps DP and DQ are better so they don't look like integrals. It also reduces the number of lowercase letters which can be difficult to remember.
Other opinions? -- Anders On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:39:13AM +0100, Kristian Ølgaard wrote: > > Will it be 'DP' and 'DQ' or 'dP' and 'dQ'? > > Recall that we use dP and dQ to denote integral over point and quadrature > points respectively. > I know that the meaning should be clear from the context, I just want to make > sure that the 'issue' has been addressed. > > Kristian > > > > On 28 February 2014 08:37, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you have missed the latest developments on the naming of elements > in the periodic table, then take a look at this: > > https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/ufl/pull-request/7/ > introduce-notation-for-the-periodic-table/diff > > I am happy with the latest suggestion from Douglas Arnold at the > bottom of the thread (the tables introducing dP elements). I think > these names strike good balance between clarity, consistency and > established notation. > > If you have any objections or opinions on the naming of elements, the > implementation of these elements in UFL, or other issues with the > table, please let me know now before we go to print. > > Here's the latest list of corrections: > > https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/wiki/ > Periodic%20Table%20of%20the%20Finite%20Elements > > > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
