On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:55:05AM +0100, Marie E. Rognes wrote: > On 02/28/2014 09:41 AM, Anders Logg wrote: > >Other opinions? > > Would you consider dropping the c (or q/C/Q) for the BDMs/RTs on > cubes? In the UFL FiniteElement constructor, the cell is given > separately, so there is no need for the family name to indicate > this. Advantages would be: simpler names and greater possibility of > code independence wrt cell type.
That would also be consistent with the use of P for both triangles and tetrahedra. -- Anders _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
