On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:22:38PM -0600, Douglas N Arnold wrote:
>
>
> On 03/03/2014 12:58 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 12:30:10PM -0600, Douglas N Arnold wrote:
> >>My option is not (1). It is the typeset version of (1) for the
> >>poster and (2) for UFL. By the typeset version, I means, e.g.,
> >>the "e" in "RTe" and "N1e" are subscripts and the "1" in N1e
> >>possibly a superscript.
> >
> >ok
> >
> >>Thus for UFL, all the votes are in favor of (2), and the only
> >>question is whether we should just reproduce the uppercase strings
> >>of (2) on the poster or print it differently in a way that uses
> >>case and scripts to clarify the meaning of the strings.
> >
> >Each box in the poster has two names in it (in addition to the FEEC
> >notation): the one printed in large bold letters and the small one
> >below in the UFL code string.
> >
> >The latter must definitely be the same as whichever option we pick for
> >UFL so (2). For the former, I think (1) would be the natural
> >choice. It already has a subscript _1, _2, _3 for the polynomial
> >degree r so it already differs from the UFL code string in that
> >respect.
> >
> >So my vote would be Option (1) for the big bold names on the poster
> >but Option (2) for UFL (both in the poster and actual implementation).
>
> I agree completely.
>
> One tiny question remains concerning the poster. For the big bold name
> of say N1E, degree 3, do we write $N^1_{e3}$ or $N1_{e3}$?
I would prefer N1e_3 = Nedelec first kind edge elements of degree 3,
or N^1e_3. I have not tried to typeset it, but I imagine it looks
better with the degree as a lone subscript. Otherwise, one might think
e3 as a compound has a special meaning.
--
Anders
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
