No point to go with 3.0.2. Then we can keep it at 2.0.11 as 3.0.2 wont work with PY3.
Johan On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:37:11 +0100 > Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We need 3.0.3 for the patch allowing correct representation of single > > file import when using relative import for PY3. Should we have > > different required versions for PY2 and PY3? > > I don't care. Johannes suggested 3.0.2 because of its availability in > Ubuntu repos. > > Jan > > > > > Johan > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Jan Blechta > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:07:48 +0100 > > > Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Jan Blechta > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Does everybody agree to bump required SWIG version to 3.0.3 > > > > > which is out since the new year's eve? > > > > > > > > How about bumping to 3.0.2? That is the version in Ubuntu 14.10 > > > > and the upcoming 15.04 release. > > > > > > I'll test whether > > > https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/pull-request/211 > > > works with 3.0.2. > > > > > > Johan, Martin, do you remember why we already require > > > 3.0.3 with Python 3? > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > Johannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > fenics mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
