On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
> The real difference is that we need 3.0.3 to support PY3.
>

Yes, but do we need any checks/boilerplate in the SWIG wrappers for
3.0.2 and 3.0.3, or is it just that PY3 will 'work' if one has SWIG
3.0.3?

Garth

> Johan
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I don't really mind either way between 3.0.2 and 3.0.3. I'm all for
>> minimising developer effort, so if there's no real difference in that
>> respect let's go with 3.0.2. Otherwise, let's require 3.0.3.
>>
>> Garth
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Ahh, yes I missed that. Then it boils down to support PY3 or be
>> > convenient
>> > for ubuntu users.
>> >
>> > Johan
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jan Blechta <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> No, 3.0.x is needed by
>> >> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/pull-request/211 even with
>> >> Python 2.
>> >>
>> >> Jan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:48:56 +0100
>> >> Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > No point to go with 3.0.2. Then we can keep it at 2.0.11 as 3.0.2
>> >> > wont work with PY3.
>> >> >
>> >> > Johan
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Jan Blechta
>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 20:37:11 +0100
>> >> > > Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > We need 3.0.3 for the patch allowing correct representation of
>> >> > > > single file import when using relative import for PY3. Should we
>> >> > > > have different required versions for PY2 and PY3?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I don't care. Johannes suggested 3.0.2 because of its availability
>> >> > > in Ubuntu repos.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Jan
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Johan
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Jan Blechta
>> >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:07:48 +0100
>> >> > > > > Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Jan Blechta
>> >> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > > > > > Does everybody agree to bump required SWIG version to 3.0.3
>> >> > > > > > > which is out since the new year's eve?
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > How about bumping to 3.0.2? That is the version in Ubuntu
>> >> > > > > > 14.10 and the upcoming 15.04 release.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > I'll test whether
>> >> > > > > https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/pull-request/211
>> >> > > > > works with 3.0.2.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Johan, Martin, do you remember why we already require
>> >> > > > > 3.0.3 with Python 3?
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Jan
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > Johannes
>> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________
>> >> > > > > > fenics mailing list
>> >> > > > > > [email protected]
>> >> > > > > > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > fenics mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to