On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you or someone else build FEniCS with fenics-install.sh (takes time > but is presumably automatic) and compare? >
I tried to test with Hashdist, but it failed for me. I'm yet to get Hashdist to work on any system. Garth > The alternative would be for me to build FEniCS manually but that takes a > lot of manual effort and it's not clear I can make a "good" build. It would > be good to get a number, not only to check for a possible regression but > also to test whether something is suboptimal in the HashDist build. > > Johannes, is the HashDist build with optimization? > > -- > Anders > > > mån 30 mars 2015 kl 17:05 skrev Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>: >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > See this question on the QA forum: >> > >> > >> > http://fenicsproject.org/qa/6875/ubuntu-compile-from-source-which-provide-better-performance >> > >> > The Cahn-Hilliard demo takes 40 seconds with 1.3 Ubuntu packages and 52 >> > seconds with 1.5+ built from source. Are these regressions in >> > performance or >> > is Johannes that much better at building Debian packages than I am >> > building >> > FEniCS (with HashDist). >> > >> >> With the 1.4 Ubuntu package (Ubuntu 14.10), I get 42s. With my build >> of the dev version (I don't use Hashdist) I get 34s. >> >> Garth >> >> > PS: Looking at the benchbot, there seem to have been some regressions in >> > the >> > timing facilities with the recent changes: >> > >> > http://fenicsproject.org/benchbot/ >> > >> > -- >> > Anders >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > fenics mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> > _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
