FEniCS 1.4 package (Ubuntu 14.10) Summary of timings | Average time Total time Reps ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apply (PETScMatrix) | 0.00033009 0.079882 242 Apply (PETScVector) | 6.9951e-06 0.005806 830 Assemble cells | 0.017927 9.5731 534 Boost Cuthill-McKee graph ordering (from dolfin::Graph) | 9.5844e-05 9.5844e-05 1 Build Boost CSR graph | 7.7009e-05 7.7009e-05 1 Build mesh number mesh entities | 0 0 2 Build sparsity | 0.0041105 0.0082209 2 Delete sparsity | 1.0729e-06 2.1458e-06 2 Init MPI | 0.055825 0.055825 1 Init PETSc | 0.056171 0.056171 1 Init dof vector | 0.00018656 0.00037313 2 Init dofmap | 0.0064399 0.0064399 1 Init dofmap from UFC dofmap | 0.0017549 0.0035098 2 Init tensor | 0.0002135 0.00042701 2 LU solver | 0.11543 27.933 242 PETSc LU solver | 0.1154 27.926 242
FEniCS dev (my build, using PETSc dev) [MPI_AVG] Summary of timings | reps wall avg wall tot ---------------------------------------------------------------- Apply (PETScMatrix) | 242 0.00020009 0.048421 Apply (PETScVector) | 830 8.5487e-06 0.0070954 Assemble cells | 534 0.017001 9.0787 Build mesh number mesh entities | 1 7.35e-07 7.35e-07 Build sparsity | 2 0.0068867 0.013773 Delete sparsity | 2 9.88e-07 1.976e-06 Init MPI | 1 0.0023164 0.0023164 Init PETSc | 1 0.002519 0.002519 Init dof vector | 2 0.00016088 0.00032177 Init dofmap | 1 0.04457 0.04457 Init dofmap from UFC dofmap | 1 0.0035997 0.0035997 Init tensor | 2 0.00034076 0.00068153 LU solver | 242 0.097293 23.545 PETSc LU solver | 242 0.097255 23.536 SCOTCH graph ordering | 1 0.0005598 0.0005598 compute connectivity 1 - 2 | 1 0.00088592 0.00088592 compute entities dim = 1 | 1 0.028021 0.028021 Garth On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Jan Blechta <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you, guys, run it with > > list_timings() > > to get a detailed structure where's the time spent? > > Jan > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:21:41 +0200 > Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Could you or someone else build FEniCS with fenics-install.sh >> > (takes time but is presumably automatic) and compare? >> >> I got 53s with the Debian packages and 1m5s with the HashDist based >> installation. >> >> > The alternative would be for me to build FEniCS manually but that >> > takes a lot of manual effort and it's not clear I can make a "good" >> > build. It would be good to get a number, not only to check for a >> > possible regression but also to test whether something is >> > suboptimal in the HashDist build. >> > >> > Johannes, is the HashDist build with optimization? >> >> DOLFIN is built with CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release. The flags for building >> PETSc is listed below. >> >> Johannes >> >> PETSc flags for Debian package: >> >> PETSC_DIR=/tmp/src/petsc-3.4.2.dfsg1 PETSC_ARCH=linux-gnu-c-opt \ >> ./config/configure.py --with-shared-libraries --with-debugging=0 \ >> --useThreads 0 --with-clanguage=C++ --with-c-support \ >> --with-fortran-interfaces=1 \ >> --with-mpi-dir=/usr/lib/openmpi --with-mpi-shared=1 \ >> --with-blas-lib=-lblas --with-lapack-lib=-llapack \ >> --with-blacs=1 --with-blacs-include=/usr/include \ >> >> --with-blacs-lib=[/usr/lib/libblacsCinit-openmpi.so,/usr/lib/libblacs-openmpi.so] >> \ >> --with-scalapack=1 --with-scalapack-include=/usr/include \ >> --with-scalapack-lib=/usr/lib/libscalapack-openmpi.so \ >> --with-mumps=1 --with-mumps-include=/usr/include \ >> >> --with-mumps-lib=[/usr/lib/libdmumps.so,/usr/lib/libzmumps.so,/usr/lib/libsmumps.so,/usr/lib/libcmumps.so,/usr/lib/libmumps_common.so,/usr/lib/libpord.so] >> \ >> --with-umfpack=1 --with-umfpack-include=/usr/include/suitesparse \ >> --with-umfpack-lib=[/usr/lib/libumfpack.so,/usr/lib/libamd.so] \ >> --with-cholmod=1 --with-cholmod-include=/usr/include/suitesparse \ >> --with-cholmod-lib=/usr/lib/libcholmod.so \ >> --with-spooles=1 --with-spooles-include=/usr/include/spooles \ >> --with-spooles-lib=/usr/lib/libspooles.so \ >> --with-hypre=1 --with-hypre-dir=/usr \ >> --with-ptscotch=1 --with-ptscotch-include=/usr/include/scotch \ >> >> --with-ptscotch-lib=[/usr/lib/libptesmumps.so,/usr/lib/libptscotch.so,/usr/lib/libptscotcherr.so] >> \ >> --with-fftw=1 --with-fftw-include=/usr/include \ >> >> --with-fftw-lib=[/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3.so,/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfftw3_mpi.so] >> \ >> --with-hdf5=1 --with-hdf5-dir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/hdf5/openmpi >> --CXX_LINKER_FLAGS="-Wl,--no-as-needed" >> >> >> PETSc flags for HashDist based build: >> >> mkdir ${PWD}/_tmp && TMPDIR=${PWD}/_tmp \ >> ./configure --prefix="${ARTIFACT}" \ >> COPTFLAGS=-O2 \ >> --with-shared-libraries=1 \ >> --with-debugging=0 \ >> --with-ssl=0 \ >> --with-blas-lapack-lib=${OPENBLAS_DIR}/lib/libopenblas.so \ >> --with-metis-dir=$PARMETIS_DIR \ >> --with-parmetis-dir=$PARMETIS_DIR \ >> --with-scotch-dir=${SCOTCH_DIR} \ >> --with-ptscotch-dir=${SCOTCH_DIR} \ >> --with-suitesparse=1 \ >> --with-suitesparse-include=${SUITESPARSE_DIR}/include/suitesparse \ >> >> --with-suitesparse-lib=[${SUITESPARSE_DIR}/lib/libumfpack.a,libklu.a,libcholmod.a,libbtf.a,libccolamd.a,libcolamd.a,libcamd.a,libamd.a,libsuitesparseconfig.a] >> \ >> --with-hypre=1 \ >> --with-hypre-include=${HYPRE_DIR}/include \ >> --with-hypre-lib=${HYPRE_DIR}/lib/libHYPRE.so \ >> --with-mpi-compilers \ >> CC=$MPICC \ >> CXX=$MPICXX \ >> F77=$MPIF77 \ >> F90=$MPIF90 \ >> FC=$MPIF90 \ >> --with-patchelf-dir=$PATCHELF_DIR \ >> --with-python-dir=$PYTHON_DIR \ >> --with-superlu_dist-dir=$SUPERLU_DIST_DIR \ >> --download-mumps=1 \ >> --download-scalapack=1 \ >> --download-blacs=1 \ >> --download-ml=1 >> >> >> > -- >> > Anders >> > >> > >> > mån 30 mars 2015 kl 17:05 skrev Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > See this question on the QA forum: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > http://fenicsproject.org/qa/6875/ubuntu-compile-from-source-which-provide-better-performance >> >> > >> >> > The Cahn-Hilliard demo takes 40 seconds with 1.3 Ubuntu packages >> >> > and 52 seconds with 1.5+ built from source. Are these >> >> > regressions in performance or >> >> > is Johannes that much better at building Debian packages than I >> >> > am building >> >> > FEniCS (with HashDist). >> >> > >> >> >> >> With the 1.4 Ubuntu package (Ubuntu 14.10), I get 42s. With my >> >> build of the dev version (I don't use Hashdist) I get 34s. >> >> >> >> Garth >> >> >> >> > PS: Looking at the benchbot, there seem to have been some >> >> > regressions in the >> >> > timing facilities with the recent changes: >> >> > >> >> > http://fenicsproject.org/benchbot/ >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Anders >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > fenics mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > fenics mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> fenics mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > > _______________________________________________ > fenics mailing list > [email protected] > http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
