I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations is likely
to change if there is an upstream improvement or regression to the
preconditioner or if the logic of checking the convergence criterion is
slightly modified.


mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>:

> On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on one of the
>> buildbots:
>>
>>
>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio
>>
>>         num_iter = solver.solve(x, b)
>> >       assert num_iter == num_iter_ref
>> E       assert 27 == 6
>>
>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me.
>>
>>
>>
> What's peculiar about it?
>
> The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the buildbot.
> The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc. This might request
> adding a function that returns the PETSc version.
>
> Garth
>
>>
>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are we
>>> waiting for something else?
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100
>>> "Garth N. Wells" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release.
>>> >
>>> > Garth
>>> >
>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >  Done.  See:
>>> > > https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheers,
>>> > > Cian
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson <[email protected]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been actively using
>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any advice on
>>> > >> cleaner fixes if that would help.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >  It would be a big help if you could bring your branch up-to-date
>>> > > with master. Thanks.
>>> > >
>>> > >  Garth
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Cian
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are the current
>>> > >>>> blockers?
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>  This one is a blocker:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>      https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Garth
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>  --
>>> > >>>> Anders
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list
>>> > >>>> [email protected]
>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> > >>> fenics mailing list
>>> > >>> [email protected]
>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> _______________________________________________
>>> > >> fenics mailing list
>>> > >> [email protected]
>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> fenics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
>>>
>>
_______________________________________________
fenics mailing list
[email protected]
http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics

Reply via email to