On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:55:46 +0000 Johannes Ring <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I can make the release tomorrow if the buildbot is green (I will Buildbot is green. If nobody touches it until tomorrow. Jan > ignore the error on wheezy-amd64 with the old PETSc version). I'm not > sure if I will have enough time to finish the binary packages, > because I am continuing my vacation on Wednesday, but I can at least > generate the tarballs and update the repositories tomorrow. Let me > know if you think I should wait until after my vacation (I will be > back in the middle of August). > > Johannes > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:00 PM Anders Logg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > ok, I didn't look closely enough. Just looked at the last piece. > > > > -- > > Anders > > > > > > mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:58 skrev Johannes Ring <[email protected]>: > > > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:45, Anders Logg <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I mean it looks very specific and that the number of iterations > >>>> is likely to change if there is an upstream improvement or > >>>> regression to the preconditioner or if the logic of checking the > >>>> convergence criterion is slightly modified. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> The reference number of iterations is computed at the > >>> beginning of the test (it's not hard-wired), so it's robust with > >>> respect to all the above issues. The test failure is showing that > >>> (a) the old version of PETSc has a bug, or (b) that DOLFIN is not > >>> interfacing properly to an old version of PETSc. Neither case is > >>> worth fixing. > >>> > >> > >> > > It is PETSc version 3.4.2 on that buildbot, so yes it is old. > >> > >> Johannes > >> > >> Garth > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 12:42 skrev Garth N. Wells > >>>> <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>>> On 27 July 2015 at 11:37, Anders Logg <[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, fixing this assertion error in one of the unit tests on > >>>>>> one of the buildbots: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org:8010/builders/dolfin-master-full-wheezy-amd64/builds/1707/steps/make%20run_unittests_py/logs/stdio > >>>>>> > >>>>>> num_iter = solver.solve(x, b) > >>>>>> > assert num_iter == num_iter_ref > >>>>>> E assert 27 == 6 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Looks like a very peculiar test to me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> What's peculiar about it? > >>>>> > >>>>> The problem is almost certainly an old version of PETSc on the > >>>>> buildbot. The test could be disabled for old versions of PETSc. > >>>>> This might request adding a function that returns the PETSc > >>>>> version. > >>>>> > >>>>> Garth > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> mån 27 juli 2015 kl 11:53 skrev Jan Blechta < > >>>>>> [email protected]>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've got rid of the last forgotten issue targeted to 1.6. Are > >>>>>>> we waiting for something else? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:26:33 +0100 > >>>>>>> "Garth N. Wells" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I think we're ready now for the 1.6 release. > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > Garth > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > On 9 July 2015 at 22:54, Cian Wilson > >>>>>>> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > Done. See: > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> https://bitbucket.org/tferma/dolfin/branch/systemassemblerfix-master > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > Cheers, > >>>>>>> > > Cian > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > On 07/08/2015 04:03 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > On 25 June 2015 at 21:20, Cian Wilson > >>>>>>> > > <[email protected] > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > wrote: > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > >> I still have a branch that fixes that and have been > >>>>>>> > >> actively > >>>>>>> using > >>>>>>> > >> it since 1.5.0 came out. > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> Happy to bring it up to current master and take any > >>>>>>> > >> advice on cleaner fixes if that would help. > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > > It would be a big help if you could bring your branch > >>>>>>> > > up-to-date with master. Thanks. > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > Garth > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > >> Cheers, > >>>>>>> > >> Cian > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> On 06/25/2015 04:14 PM, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >>> On 25 June 2015 at 19:36, Anders Logg <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> What is the status of the upcoming release? Which are > >>>>>>> > >>>> the > >>>>>>> current > >>>>>>> > >>>> blockers? > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> This one is a blocker: > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/fenics-project/dolfin/issue/494 > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> Garth > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >>> -- > >>>>>>> > >>>> Anders > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >>>> fenics mailing list > >>>>>>> > >>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>>>>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >>> fenics mailing list > >>>>>>> > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>>>>>> > >>> > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >> fenics mailing list > >>>>>>> > >> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>>>>>> > >> > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> fenics mailing list > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>> fenics mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ fenics mailing list [email protected] http://fenicsproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fenics
