On 28 April 2010 11:59, Garth N. Wells <[email protected]> wrote:
On 27/04/10 13:52, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:On 27 April 2010 14:18, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote:Any ideas on how to keep the code in the documentation and the actual demos in sync? Should we have a script that copies all the source files? Or should we do the opposite: extract the demos from the documentation?Good question, initially I thought copying from DOLFIN to documentation was the way to go, but on second thought the other way around might be better. The reason is that if the demos break, then they will be fixed in the documentation which makes is more likely that the accompanying text (and code snippets) will also be corrected.We'll usually have the source code for a demo broken into pieces in the documentation with an explanation for each part of the code (rather than one big chunk), so how would this work with syncing to the actual demo code?
I think the entire main.cpp file (and UFL ) should be available for download as it is now. Then, if a demo breaks one will have to manually modify the code snippets and the text. (and of course the code in main.cpp and the UFL file if appropriate) Kristian
GarthKristian-- Anders
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
