On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:04:27PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> > wrote: > > On 15 June 2012 12:01, Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no> > >> wrote: > >>> UFL and ffc both need 1.0.1 and 1.1.0. > >> > >> There are no changes in lp:ufl/1.0.x since 1.0.0 so why do we need two > >> releases of UFL? > > > > I have some changes to add. Just needs testing. > > OK. > > >> I agree with Marie that it is confusing. The changes between UFC trunk > >> and 2.0.x are minimal, so we should only need one release of UFC. > >> > >> Johannes > > > > In general, 1.0.x fit together, and 1.1.x fit together. > > > > UFC is the exception for historical reasons. > > Once UFC becomes incompatible with the 1.0.x line, make it 2.1.x. > > OK, so we will need > > DOLFIN 1.0.1 > FFC 1.0.1 > Instant 1.0.1 > UFC 2.0.6 > UFL 1.0.1 > Viper 1.0.1 > > and > > DOLFIN 1.1.0 > FFC 1.1.0 > FIAT 1.1.0 > Instant 1.1.0 > UFC 2.0.6 (same as above) > UFL 1.1.0 > Viper 1.1.0
It seems like reality is catching up with us. I'm at a conference, Garth is busy and we have not had time to make a release candidate. So let's just relax and make the release when we've found time for a code/bug sprint and one or more release candidates. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : fenics@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
