On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Garth N. Wells <gn...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 6 March 2013 12:53, Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:10:59PM +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> It was suggested earlier today that we make a new release. No one has >>>> objected and I have been appointed as the release manager, so we are >>>> then at step four in the development model [1]. >>>> Tomorrow, March 6, I will fork the development branches into 1.2.x >>>> branches [2] to prepare for the release of FEniCS 1.2. The buildbot >>>> will then be updated to build the 1.2.x branches, and when it is >>>> green, we can go ahead and make the release. Alternatively, we can >>>> wait one week as suggested by the development model. Development can >>>> of course continue in the development branches, but only bug fixes >>>> will be merged into the 1.2.x branches to be included in the 1.2 >>>> release. >>>> [1] http://fenicsproject.org/contributing/development_model.html >>>> [2] DOLFIN, FFC, Instant, UFC (2.2.x) and UFL are needed >>> >>> Sounds great. I don't think we should need to wait a week. As soon as >>> the buildbot is green we can make a release. Then 1.2.1 can follow if >>> we find (more) bugs. >> >> ok, I have made the branches for the 1.2.x series and set the expected >> release date to Friday March 8. >> > > Can I squeeze in our HDF5 updates? I'm just double-checking the tests now.
ok! Johannes _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics Post to : fenics@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
