Greetings,

----- Original Message -----
> Numbers are, in fact, the only thing that really matter in this.

I disagree... but then again I don't do any social media nor do I have (or 
want) a cell phone.

> A) 10 videos with 50 views each.
> B) 1 video with 500,000 views.

As a viewer of such videos... I definitely prefer A.  Any other questions I can 
answer for you?

Again, given time... and assuming the topics and presenters are of reasonable 
quality... I'm sure the SELF video viewer count will pick up.  The numbers 
given are only for the YouTube postings... and perhaps they have been 
distributed in other places as well... so the numbers you see may or may not be 
indicative.

To drill my point in even further... people care more about presentation videos 
more closely to when the show happened rather than months or a year later.  I 
think you'll agree with that point.

I in no way mean to make this a LFNW vs. SELF contest.  I've never been to SELF 
but I've been to LFNW about 9 times.  Which do you think I prefer?  As one 
would expect, there are a number of Linux-oriented organizations who send their 
people to many conference all over the US and abroad... and there is a certain 
amount of content that is duplicated across them... with a decent amount being 
local.  

SCALE had their videos up within days of their conference (with some being 
posted before it was over).  They did that by just sticking a camera in each 
room and immediately posting it to YouTube... so all of the content was 
posted... in 6-8+ hour videos... with multiple presentations (all that happened 
in a particular room) per video.  Not the most elegant way to do it... but as a 
watcher of such videos... I appreciated it being accessible ASAP... assuming 
reasonable quality (content and playback).

TYL,
-- 
Scott Dowdle
704 Church Street
Belgrade, MT 59714
(406)388-0827 [home]
(406)994-3931 [work]
_______________________________________________
Fest-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.blug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fest-list

Reply via email to