On 18-Mar-2001, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should these functions be available through the standard FFI? IMHO: yes, they should be available, either through the standard FFI or through some other standard module. But it would be a good idea to document their semantics. -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit | of excellence is a lethal habit" WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp. _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Alastair Reid
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Fergus Henderson
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Alastair Reid
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeI... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and un... Alastair Reid
- Re: RE: unsafePerformI... malcolm-ffi
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Alastair Reid
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow