> Without a standard way to get > at unsafePerformIO, such code would still rely on > non-standard features, which goers against the aim of > standardising the rest of the FFI. The Hugs-GHC standard libs have them exported from IOExts. Of course, the Hugs-GHC standard isn't an official Haskell library committee approved standard but, since it's something like 4 years old, I think it's a better candidate for approval than the ffi library which hasn't really stabilised yet, hasn't been whacked on by a large number of users, is much younger, etc. A _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
- unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Alastair Reid
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Fergus Henderson
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInter... Alastair Reid
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeI... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- RE: unsafePerformIO and un... Alastair Reid
- Re: RE: unsafePerformI... malcolm-ffi
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleav... Alastair Reid
- RE: unsafePerformIO and unsafeInterleaveIO Simon Marlow