Ian Lynagh wrote: > The specification of nullPtr looks to me like it is not necessarily > the same as NULL in C. Is this intentional?
I don't think so: 0 resp. NULL is the only "special" pointer value in C/C++ IIRC, so this should be clarified => Manuel? Cheers, S. -- Sven Panne Fon: +49/89/99567000 Fax: +49/89/99567461 BetaResearch GmbH, Betastr. 1, D-85774 Unterfoehring mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.betaresearch.de _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
