Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Ian Lynagh wrote: > > The specification of nullPtr looks to me like it is not necessarily > > the same as NULL in C. Is this intentional? > > I don't think so: 0 resp. NULL is the only "special" pointer value > in C/C++ IIRC, so this should be clarified => Manuel?
Agreed. (We'll put an explicit statement in somewhere.) Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
