On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 04:29:13PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > On Sat, 16 Aug 2014 15:12:55 +0100 > Kieran Kunhya <kier...@obe.tv> wrote: > > > > like i said, iam happy to resign, if that reunites the projects and > > > resolves the problems > > > how can my resignation not be enough, if as you say iam the blocking > > > factor ? > > > > You impose conditions on your resignation. > > We probably had this a dozens of times, but which are these? Would be > nice if Michael could make this explicit.
in the end, there really are none. FFmpeg is a project driven by its community, its that community which must live with and under the conditions. I just think that it would be bad if developers could block others work and there was nothing that could deal with that. one can say this in many different ways each havng a subtile different effect, like That authors and people actively maintaining some code cant be blocked by people who are neither authors nor actively maintaining the code in question. Its all supposed to achive the same thing, ive no idea which, if any makes most sense [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB In fact, the RIAA has been known to suggest that students drop out of college or go to community college in order to be able to afford settlements. -- The RIAA
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
