Rémi Denis-Courmont (12023-05-02): > Please re-read the comments. You are totally misses the point.
I confess so, indeed, I completely failed to understand your point after reading your comment multiple times. > Well, I'll add myself to the already long list of people publicly objecting > to > your patchset then. I will read your technical comments then. > > There is nothing about heap allocation in this code. And if code can be > > in the framework common to all backends, then it is where it belongs, > > not duplicated in each backend. > This makes zero sense. Why the hell would you want to have more than one heap- > allocation backend. FFmpeg only provides one. Applications can decide to provide their own if they want. That is the point. > Well duh, I wrote the VLC equivalent years ago. And glibc or FreeBSD libc did > them more than a decade before I did. Pointer? > And I decided to object to that on the basis that it's dumb and confusing. The only thing dumb and confusing I see here is the mail I am answering to. > I think I was pretty damn clear and you are just deliberately making up > reason > to ignore other people's comments (not just mine). Think what you will about me. -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
