Le perjantaina 21. helmikuuta 2025, 20.02.16 UTC+2 Tomas Härdin a écrit : > The above said, I'm not against Rust. It has some nice properties. But > it does not seem very "stable" so far. Perhaps this has changed in > recent years..
IME, it's become very usable for user-space code. Bare metal still pretty much requires unstable features, but that's not a problem for FFmpeg. We may want to depend on the allocator_api unstable feature for fallible allocations (or just allow non-fallible allocations in Rust code until that gets stabilised). Naked functions would be nice for assembler, but I don't think that we have any urgent need to call assembler from Rust (as opposed to from C). > If we're in the habit of allowing other languages I'd be in favor of > allowing C++, so that we can make use of the STL containers rather than > rolling our own. Yikes. Rust is actually way saner for type-generic programming than C++. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont Villeneuve de Tapiola, ex-République finlandaise d´Uusimaa _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
