On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 5:19 PM Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Patch attached. >
LGTM. Seems like as part of moving prediction method from codec context to private options in 2862b63783b5556f7f3fb2d097629bc6879f833a the gradient value was kept as an alternative, even though even then it was just being checked against. If the value was not in the middle in UtVideo, I would note that it may have made sense to just drop any references or checking for this value from utvideoenc, but alas I don't think that's possible? Jan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
