Jan Ekström:
> On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 5:19 PM Andreas Rheinhardt
> <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> Patch attached.
>>
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Seems like as part of moving prediction method from codec context to
> private options in 2862b63783b5556f7f3fb2d097629bc6879f833a the
> gradient value was kept as an alternative, even though even then it
> was just being checked against.
> 
> If the value was not in the middle in UtVideo, I would note that it
> may have made sense to just drop any references or checking for this
> value from utvideoenc, but alas I don't think that's possible?
> 

It would be possible to use encoder-specific constants for the option
and translate this to the codec-specific ones that get written in the
file. Users that only set the prediction method via the strings (like
"-pred median") would not be affected, but users using the
codec-specific numerical values would be.
I opted for the minimal change in my patch.

- Andreas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to