On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 15:08:10 +0530 Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro> wrote: > > > On 2025-08-12 03:04 pm, Niklas Haas wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:16:19 +0200 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > >> ffmpeg-...@ffmpeg.org (HE12025-08-12): > >>> Author: Niklas Haas <g...@haasn.dev> > >>> AuthorDate: Mon Aug 11 15:57:24 2025 +0200 > >>> Commit: Niklas Haas <ffm...@haasn.dev> > >>> CommitDate: Tue Aug 12 09:01:39 2025 +0000 > >> Pushing after less than 24 hours without approval by the maintainer is > >> absolutely unacceptable, forge or no forge, and a spit in my face for > >> the time I invested into starting to look at the code, thankfully > >> limited. > > In https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Patch-review-process it says: > > > >> After a patch is approved it will be committed to the repository. > > I don't see anything about a time-frame requirement here. > > It's the last point in > https://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Patches_002fCommitting
I see that, but note: 1) the PR *was* approved 2) nobody is listed as a maintainer for these filters Regardless, I still think we should then just establish a clear pipeline here to prevent this sort of discussion from happening in the future. Timo, can something like the VLC merge bot be implemented in ForgeJo? > > Regards, > Gyan > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
