On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 17:59:44 +0200 Kacper Michajlow <kaspe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 at 14:35, Tristan Matthews via ffmpeg-devel > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > For reference, that's https://code.videolan.org/Garf/homer-bot > > Obviously that's gitlab specific but may help inform some choices here. > > Because of course there is homer-bot... I think everyone seen > marge-bot too https://github.com/smarkets/marge-bot (also GitLab > specific) > > Forgejo is API compatible with GitHub, so we could reuse solutions > that work there. Also in general Forgejo itself is more basic in > itself, doesn't support marge queues/trains, so any solution would > have to be a custom bot.
For what it's worth, I was briefly discussing the idea of a merge bot with Timo over IRC, and the conclusion we arrived at is that we could also recreate the functionality of a merge queue that way. Basically, the merge bot would first rebase a PR, and only merge it once the CI passes - repeating as necessary until all "mergable" PRs are merged. > > - Kacper > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
