On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 10:49:00 +0200 Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> Hi all > > 2 months ago we voted on testing Forgejo vs Gitlab, we picked and > tested Forgejo. And as said in that vote, (and surprisingly, i have > not forgotten it) heres the "after testing" discussion and vote > > do we want to keep Forgejo or switch back to the ML workflow > (or something else) > > F. keep Forgejo as primary forge for patch/git workflow > M. switch back to the ML for patch/git workflow > > all GA members can vote, by publically replying here with a > "F." / "Forgejo" vs "M." / "ML" > End time is in 7 days unless teh community wants to extend that. > (Also if results are inconclusive like because a 3rd option emerges > then ill restart this with condorcet on vote.ffmpeg.org) > > * If we keep forgejo we will likely transition our issue tracker > tickets into forgejo too, discussing with timo yesterday night > indicates that this likely can be done cleaner and neater than at > first expected. > > * if we switch back to the ML, we still could have subsystem > maintainers using their own forge > > > thx > F --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list -- ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org To unsubscribe send an email to ffmpeg-devel-le...@ffmpeg.org
