On 1/27/2016 6:18 PM, Stephen Hutchinson wrote: > I have no strong opinion on it. 68 seems like the compromise > position since it'd allow both 1.8 and 1.9 to be used, whereas > any of the earlier ones still fall within 1.8's dev cycle and would > only be used by those users making builds against Mercurial > (most of which are probably going to be using builds from > more recently than 5+ months ago anyway).
OK. - Derek _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
