On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 05:52:24PM +0000, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > On 1/27/2016 6:18 PM, Stephen Hutchinson wrote: > > I have no strong opinion on it. 68 seems like the compromise > > position since it'd allow both 1.8 and 1.9 to be used, whereas > > any of the earlier ones still fall within 1.8's dev cycle and would > > only be used by those users making builds against Mercurial > > (most of which are probably going to be using builds from > > more recently than 5+ months ago anyway). > > OK.
applied thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. -- Diogenes of Sinope
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
