On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have
> any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic
> patches in our tree, so it is ok imo.
I only see one patch - did I miss one? - , and if that's the one you're
referring to, it should at least be created with git format-patch (and
thus include a proper commit message).
ffmpeg-devel mailing list