2016-10-18 13:11 GMT+02:00 Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net>:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>> In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have
>> any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic
>> patches in our tree, so it is ok imo.
> I only see one patch - did I miss one? - , and if that's the one you're
I meant this one on the mailing list contrary to the first - inacceptable
- one on github, sorry.
> referring to, it should at least be created with git format-patch (and
> thus include a proper commit message).
ffmpeg-devel mailing list