2016-10-18 13:11 GMT+02:00 Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net>: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 00:21:42 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >> In any case, your second patch is acceptable, should not have >> any adversary effects and we have significantly worse cosmetic >> patches in our tree, so it is ok imo. > > I only see one patch - did I miss one? - , and if that's the one you're
I meant this one on the mailing list contrary to the first - inacceptable - one on github, sorry. > referring to, it should at least be created with git format-patch (and > thus include a proper commit message). Of course. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel