2017-03-20 10:03 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-03-20 9:42 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: >>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>> 2017-03-20 9:35 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: >>>> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: >>>> >> 2017-03-20 8:57 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <g...@videolan.org>: >>>> >> > ffmpeg | branch: master | Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> | Mon Mar 20 >>>> >> > 08:52:07 2017 +0100| [3835283293bfd38ba69203f4618f0f0f21377bcc] | >>>> >> > committer: Clément Bœsch >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Merge commit '4fb311c804098d78e5ce5f527f9a9c37536d3a08' >>>> >> > >>>> >> > * commit '4fb311c804098d78e5ce5f527f9a9c37536d3a08': >>>> >> > Drop memalign hack >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Merged, as this may indeed be uneeded since >>>> >> > 46e3936fb04d06550151e667357065e3f646da1a. >>>> >> >>>> >> How are we supposed to test the next crash because >>>> >> of missing alignment? >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > I thought it was only about compatibility with platforms not having >>>> > an aligned allocator. >>>> >>>> If you think such platforms exist, one more reason not to merge... >>> >>> There was apparently MinGW but it seemed to have been fixed >>> (see the hash reference in the merge description). >> >> I can only add that the simple idea of removing support for >> platforms without any cause fills me with shame. >> > > If you can name a platfom that needs this in current git master, then > we can move forward.
Old MingW comes to mind... > Everything else is just trolling Thank you, it makes me always happy knowing I am the only one supposed to follow the new guidelines. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
