On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:14:21AM +0100, Hendrik Leppkes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-03-20 10:03 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com>: > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> 2017-03-20 9:42 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: > >>>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:38:15AM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>>>> 2017-03-20 9:35 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me>: > >>>>> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:17:36AM +0100, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>>>> >> 2017-03-20 8:57 GMT+01:00 Clément Bœsch <g...@videolan.org>: > >>>>> >> > ffmpeg | branch: master | Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> | Mon Mar 20 > >>>>> >> > 08:52:07 2017 +0100| [3835283293bfd38ba69203f4618f0f0f21377bcc] | > >>>>> >> > committer: Clément Bœsch > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Merge commit '4fb311c804098d78e5ce5f527f9a9c37536d3a08' > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > * commit '4fb311c804098d78e5ce5f527f9a9c37536d3a08': > >>>>> >> > Drop memalign hack > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > Merged, as this may indeed be uneeded since > >>>>> >> > 46e3936fb04d06550151e667357065e3f646da1a. > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> How are we supposed to test the next crash because > >>>>> >> of missing alignment? > >>>>> >> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > I thought it was only about compatibility with platforms not having > >>>>> > an aligned allocator. > >>>>> > >>>>> If you think such platforms exist, one more reason not to merge... > >>>> > >>>> There was apparently MinGW but it seemed to have been fixed > >>>> (see the hash reference in the merge description). > >>> > >>> I can only add that the simple idea of removing support for > >>> platforms without any cause fills me with shame. > >>> > >> > >> If you can name a platfom that needs this in current git master, then > >> we can move forward. > > > > Old MingW comes to mind... > > > > As was pointed out above, old mingw was fixed in another commit right > before this one. > If you can find an actual reproducable case on current git master, > please do provide said information.
Is the mixture of memalign() and free() spec compliant ? IIRC you said in IRC memalign and free would be ok in posix but as i checked now i cannot find memalign in posix only posix_memalign() but maybe i looked at the wrong place [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
