On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 02:42:20PM -0500, Brian Matherly wrote: > On 9/23/2017 5:22 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 08:39:19PM -0500, Brian Matherly wrote: > >>Correctly set frame.interlaced and frame.top_field_first when pic_struct > >>indicates paired fields. > >Do you have a (small) sample that gets fixed by this ? > > > >Can you make a fate test for this case ? > > > >[...] > > > > Thanks Michael, > > I submitted a V2 patch (sorry about the double e-mail). V2 includes > a fate test which uses probeframes. The reason I test probeframes is > because the pixel data in the frame is exactly the same with/wo the > patch - and the important part of the test is the value of the > interlaced_frame and repeat_first_field fields. > > The sample file is uploaded to the videolan uploader: paired_fields.hevc
> It should be placed in: fate-suite/hevc/paired_fields.hevc uploaded [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Into a blind darkness they enter who follow after the Ignorance, they as if into a greater darkness enter who devote themselves to the Knowledge alone. -- Isha Upanishad
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
