On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:36:23 +0100 Timo Rothenpieler <t...@rothenpieler.org> wrote:
> >> I'd like to look through it again and test a bit more (will try to > >> do so tomorrow, certainly by the end of the week), but I think it > >> should be ready to commit with the external header removed. > > > > Are you planning to remove Nvidia headers as well? > > No, I am very much against this. > And others have also voiced against that. > > Also, I don't see a problem with including this AMD header. It very > much increases the accessibility and maintainability(no need to watch > out for potential breaking upstream changes, however likely that > might be). Having those vendor-specific hwaccels enabled in otherwise > generic builds gives a lot of people easy access, or access at all. > > It also might make them potential usage candidates for browsers, no > idea how their weird lawyer-code-review system works though, and if > it has any impact to avoid external dependencies. > I feel the same way; I'm fine with the header in-tree. --phil _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel