2017-11-27 16:29 GMT+01:00 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org>:
> Carl Eugen Hoyos (2017-11-27):
>> ffmpeg | branch: master | Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceffm...@gmail.com> | Mon Nov 27 
>> 14:05:28 2017 +0100| [b7324950c0fc84a93d4e7abdfd2b75ea647ec3fc] | committer: 
>> Carl Eugen Hoyos
>> lavd/alsa: Double maximum alsa buffer size.
>> Fixes recording from ATI Wonder 600 USB adapter, regression since e35c674d.
> Why was this pushed without discussion?
>> Reported and analyzed by: Marco Paolieri, paolieri at gmail
> This is no analyze, just empirical guesswork.

The patch that introduced the regression was not discussed and
it used a guessed limit afair.
The patch that fixed ticket #373 simply doubled the value to fix
a particular use-case.
After this patch that follows this logic, the possible allocation
is still a magnitude smaller than the original commit claims.
(I cannot test the failing case.)

Do you want me to revert?
Any better suggestions?

Thank you, Carl Eugen
ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Reply via email to