Carl Eugen Hoyos (2017-11-27): > The patch that introduced the regression was not discussed and > it used a guessed limit afair.
Two wrong don't make a right. You should not have pushed without discussion. > The patch that fixed ticket #373 simply doubled the value to fix > a particular use-case. Well, it was wrong too, I did not notice at the time. > After this patch that follows this logic, the possible allocation > is still a magnitude smaller than the original commit claims. > (I cannot test the failing case.) > > Do you want me to revert? I want you to refrain from pushing this kind of patch. > Any better suggestions? When the problem is that the value returned by snd_pcm_hw_params_get_buffer_size_max() is too large and the cap set by ALSA_BUFFER_SIZE_MAX is too small, the obvious fix is to involve snd_pcm_hw_params_get_buffer_size_min(). Regards, -- Nicolas George
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel