Got it. Do I have to post an updated patch as a reply to this thread? Valery _____________________________ From: Lou Logan <l...@lrcd.com> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 10:20 PM Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/openh264enc.c: generate IDR frame in response to I frame pict_type To: <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:01:16 +0100 Valery Kot <valery....@gmail.com> wrote: > From f95943165c91dac13a644365f775aff3dd9edb11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: vkot <valery....@4cinsights.com> > Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 13:51:51 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 3/3] avcodec/openh264enc.c: generate IDR frame in response to > I frame pict_type > > --- > libavcodec/libopenh264enc.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/libavcodec/libopenh264enc.c b/libavcodec/libopenh264enc.c > index fdadb101f5..12e9ad49ed 100644 > --- a/libavcodec/libopenh264enc.c > +++ b/libavcodec/libopenh264enc.c > @@ -245,6 +245,10 @@ static int svc_encode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, > AVPacket *avpkt, > } > sp.iPicWidth = avctx->width; > sp.iPicHeight = avctx->height; > + The above line has trailing whitespace which should be avoided. You can use tools/patcheck to check, and git should provide a warning when applying the patch. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel